Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Bangle's raw ideas have taken a while to be refined ...but the recent results are all extremely exciting. There is a maturity in this design. All the ideas of flame-surfacing and irregularity have been fully resolved ....and now we are seeing the results of a design team which knows exactly what it is trying to achieve. There is deliberation, methodology, and ideology behind these designs -- something their main competitors are still struggling with a little. |
That's exactly how I see it too. Though I really still don't know whether it's right to credit Bangle for BMW's design language.
Bangle had a theory, A vision and that's to shock, to provoke and to present product with "critical" appearence in order to keep the cars as intersting as possible for as long as possible.
But how this theory eventually became metal that you can touch, is what two other designers, who created the two concept cars that defined the successful look of BMW: Adrian van Hooydonk with his Z9 and Chris Chapman with his X-Coupé.
Chris Bangle gets all the press, but these two guys need to be credited as much as he was
