  | |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review)This is a discussion on W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) within the S-Class forums, part of the Mercedes-Benz category; Quality reports on performance cars are kind of hard to find. I thought the one on the S65 looked interesting.. ... |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
11-18-2008, 04:57 PM
| #1 |
| Aficionado   Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
  | W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) Quality reports on performance cars are kind of hard to find. I thought the one on the S65 looked interesting.. --->>Reliability Ratings — 2008 Mercedes-Benz S-Class S65 AMG — Yahoo! Autos --->> extended S-Class review Reliability Ratings Comparison on Yahoo! Autos
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. |
|            |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GTA8.5 For This Useful Post: |
| Sponsored Links |
|
11-18-2008, 06:09 PM
| #2 |
| Contributor   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA Garage: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet
Posts: 15,642
Thanks: 5,226
Thanked 9,531 Times in 4,030 Posts
| Re: W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) Just quickly glancing at the data, the W221 just kills the W220 in nearly every category. M
__________________ Merc1 Allstars: SLS, SL63, S65, SLK55, CL63, SL65 BS, E63, R8 5.2, S5, LP560, LP670, M3, Mulsne, BK, DBS, GT500, Gran S, 911, X6M, Z4, Veyron GS, XFR, XKR, ZR1, CC, GTI, CTSV, 458, 599. |
|
| |
|
11-18-2008, 08:13 PM
| #3 | |
| The Photo Phanatic  Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Munich, Germany Garage: '08 BMW 118i
Posts: 12,988
Thanks: 10,448
Thanked 9,147 Times in 3,289 Posts
| Re: W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) Quote:
 It's hard to imagine how boring the W220 S-Class now looks. I remember how I always thought it looked elegant and classy and in AMG trim it looked really nice. Sporty and very elegant. But now, with the W221 taking over, I can't look at the W220 anymore. The W221 not only outclasses it in technology, quality etc., but also in design, inside and out - IMO.
__________________ CWPhotography | |
|
| |
|
11-18-2008, 10:04 PM
| #4 | |
| Fanatic  Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Las Vegas Garage: 1987 190E
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 294
Thanked 640 Times in 394 Posts
| Re: W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
11-19-2008, 08:46 AM
| #5 |
| Aficionado Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
| Re: W221 S65 AMG vs. W220 S65 AMG (JD Power Quality review) I agree with wimmer430... The W221 has all the elegance of the W220 but adds a bit more aggressiveness to the look. On top of that, in AMG trim it`s driving character is more dynamic as the owners suggests. There is no question that the W221 S-Class, is an excellent car to own.
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| amg, jd, power, quality, review, s65, w220, w221 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *The Mercedes-Benz FAQ Thread* (Brand History, Model Designations, Photos etc.) | cawimmer430 | The Mercedes-Benz Lounge | 1 | 02-13-2008 05:50 AM |
| Edmunds Inside Line - Follow-Up Test: 2007 Mercedes-Benz S65 AMG | Merc1 | S-Class | 8 | 11-23-2007 10:46 AM |
| BMW V8 M3 engine: official pics & info [Part II] | EnI | 3 Series | 195 | 09-01-2007 10:29 AM |
| BMW E92 3er Coupe: official PR text & info. | EnI | 3 Series | 269 | 07-02-2006 06:27 PM |
