Quote:
What's new?
On paper, the new Mercedes ML63 AMG makes little sense. On the road, it mesmerises with a breadth of talent no two-tonne-plus car has any right to possess. This is a muscle car as quick as any current 4x4 in a straight line – Porsche Cayenne Turbo S included.
You won’t have too much trouble distinguishing the ML63 from lesser M-classes when it arrives in the UK in June. Exterior changes include deeper front and rear spoilers, widened wheelarches, and imposing 19-inch wheels.
The AMG makeover continues in the cabin. Sport seats and steering wheel, and carbonfibre-look trim go some way to justifying the
estimated £60,000 price.
It’s under the bonnet, however, that the real interest lies, in the form of a new naturally aspirated 6.2-litre 503bhp V8.
What's it like?
One probing nudge on the throttle has the ML63 shimmying excitedly and unleashing a genuine muscle-car soundtrack. For all its bravado, though, the big off-roader is remarkably docile around town.
Merc’s 7G-Tronic seven-speed auto gearbox has been upgraded to handle the power and torque. It’s a great transmission: kicking down eagerly and holding onto gears through corners. AMG has also tweaked the four-wheel-drive system to dole out the drive in a rear-biased 40:60 split rather than the standard M-class’s 50:50 arrangement.
Mercedes claims 0-62mph in 5.0sec, but if anything the in-gear acceleration is even more remarkable, thanks to the transmission’s broad spread of ratios and the engine’s belting mid-range urge.
Find a suitable back road and the ML63 offers sharper lines of communication between steering wheel and road than just about any rival, feeling more like a well-sorted estate car than big off-roader.
Should I buy one?
Although it’s unlikely anyone buying an ML63 will care much about economy, its thirst cannot be denied. AMG quotes just 17.4mpg, so even with a huge 95-litre fuel tank you’ll be stopping regularly to fill up. At least that magnificent V8 makes the journey away from the pumps something special.
Greg Kable
|
http://www.autocarmagazine.com/First...p?RT_ID=219524
For those of you that read car magazines religously like myself, I've made a keen observation here. Both Autocar and CAR magazine write the same style reviews where they ask questions then create an answer in detailed explanation. I don't know, maybe this is part of CAR magazine's going downhill w/ new editor Jason Barlow, but w/ many of the reviews I read in CAR it seems like they waltz around in brit jargon that can leave non brit readers, such as myself, cold, bored, and greatly uninformed. Autocar on the other hand, from the same country, very clear and undiluted auto journalsim at it's best.
