 | | |||||
| ||||||
 | ||||||||
| M-Class W164 Currently in Production (2005 - W163 Produced during (1998 - 2005) |
| Notices |
| View Poll Results: Your Pick? | |||
| Pre FL |     | 24 | 40.68% |
| FL (New) |    | 35 | 59.32% |
| Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1 (permalink))
  |
| Expert   Posts: 14,676 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Gothenburg Thanks: 328
Thanked 1,960 Times in 1,015 Posts
  | ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 11:40 AM
      Please chose your favourite.. PS I must say, when you look at the 2 side by side, you instantly feel how old the pre fl looks  |
| |         |
| Sponsored Links |
|
(#4 (permalink))
|
| Devotee   Posts: 3,374 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Cairo. I drive: Italian. Thanks: 2,245
Thanked 344 Times in 313 Posts
| Re: ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 11:55 AM
I like everything about the new FL except that hideous silver front maybe in black i'd change my mind,my vote goes to new one |
| | |
|
(#5 (permalink))
|
| Fanatic  Posts: 2,303 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: France (Paris) I drive: 1974 Mercedes-Benz 450 SLC Thanks: 796
Thanked 1,002 Times in 592 Posts
| Re: ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 12:04 PM
I voted pre-FL. The new AMG is awful in my eyes. The front is ugly. And the rear diffusor... I don't know what material it is made with, this rear diffusor? However, for the regular ML, I prefer the FL one. Looks more distinctive, especially the front, and the interior seems much improved. |
| | |
|
(#7 (permalink))
|
| Expert  Posts: 12,374 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London & Gothenburg Thanks: 1,569
Thanked 3,011 Times in 1,489 Posts
|  Re: ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 12:54 PM
Holly crap, that are Mercedes on to. They have completely ruined the ML63, what's that transformer looking front end they are trying to pull off. |
| | |
|
(#8 (permalink))
|
| Me for President  Posts: 17,665 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden I drive: Rear Wheel Drive Thanks: 1,305
Thanked 5,413 Times in 2,224 Posts
| Re: ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 01:38 PM
Pre-facelift. The car was more elegant and not busy like now, even a standard prefacelift ML looks nice in my eyes. Now MB ruined the ML , its a disaster imo and the AMG version isnt helping. Probably the first time I vote for a prefacelift. |
| | |
|
(#9 (permalink))
|
| Enthusiast  Posts: 302 Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Washington, DC Thanks: 127
Thanked 239 Times in 107 Posts
| Re: ML63: Pre FL vs FL -
03-13-2008, 01:47 PM
I like them both, but I have to vote for the new one. More of it to love. Bigger grill, dynamic accents better interior, better wheels, etc, etc, etc. |
| | |
|
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Review: Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG | Bartek Sikorski | M-Class | 0 | 10-08-2007 09:41 PM |
| Road & Track, ML63 AMG Road Test | Bruce | M-Class | 18 | 04-07-2007 04:04 PM |
| Autocar ML63 AMG review | Deutsch | M-Class | 4 | 04-20-2006 01:41 AM |
| Chicago Auto Show: Mercedes ML63 AMG | Alx | M-Class | 13 | 02-13-2006 12:41 AM |