| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur?This is a discussion on S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Ok I thought this would be kind of interesting comparison because in terms of price and engine size the most ... |
| View Poll Results: WHICH? | |||
| S65 AMG | | 28 | 59.57% |
| Flying Spur | | 19 | 40.43% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Ok I thought this would be kind of interesting comparison because in terms of price and engine size the most comparable car the the S65 is actually the Bentley flying Spur. Their prices are similar and their performance is very similar. So, what would you rather have, an S65 AMG or a Bentley Flying Spur. Both very sexy cars, indeed. Bentley Flying Spur: Engine Type: W12, Twin-turbo Displacement cu in (cc): 366 (5998) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 560(411) / 6100 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 479(650) / 1600 Redline at RPM: n.a. Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 275/40 R19 Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: 208.9 × 83.4 × 58.2 Weight lb (kg): 5456 (2475) Performance Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.9 Top Speed mph (km/h): 195 (312) Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a. Price: $170,000 S65 AMG: Engine Type: V12, Biturbo Displacement cu in (cc): 365 (5980) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 604(450) / 4800 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 738(1000) / 2000-4000 Redline at RPM: 5950 Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 255/40 ZR19 - 275/40 ZR19 Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: n.a. Weight lb (kg): n.a. Performance Acceleration 0-60 mph s: 4.2 Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 13/20 (n.a.) Price: $169,000 S65 ![]() ![]() ![]() not an S65 (but theres just not enough photos of S65 interior) ![]() FLYING SPUR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. Last edited by Matt; 02-06-2006 at 09:53 PM. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 |
| Executive ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Gothenburg
Posts: 17,576
Thanks: 510
Thanked 3,589 Times in 1,709 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? lol one of those pics with the mocca steering is the CLK DTM PS The FS is a frog.. and the S65 is the hottest sedan on earth.. this could not be easier for me..
__________________ When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return. Leonardo Da Vinci |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I dont think so^. I think the Spur is elegant and more discreet than the flashy S 65. notice: these cars are direct competitors, both have the same price, both have 12 cylinder engines, both are twin turbo charged.
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65! it`s supposed to have flash, it`s an AMG unlike the normal S-Class. Plus the S-Class has gotton quit a few awards, it`s a winner! ![]()
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,621
Thanks: 176
Thanked 696 Times in 350 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
Unfortunetely I haven't seen either of these cars in person so I just have no idea. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? look at the wood in the Bentley...Its just beutiful. I personally like the interior of the Spur better. Its so "lush" and cushy yet the wood is classy and very beautiful (it looks like oak or something).
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I`m not impressed with the Bently FS. Give me the S65, now if I were older the Bently might work....., naaaaa! S65
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,446
Thanks: 853
Thanked 1,278 Times in 515 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65, Flying Spur is OK. Saw one yesterday and I thought it was just OK, they didn't do enough to differentiate the sedan from the coupe. Boring design, IMO. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? This poll will turn around. Lets just weight for the Audi boys. You know its hot!
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bentley, flying, s65, spur |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Gear - Bentley Flying Spur. | Yannis | Sound and Vision | 7 | 02-07-2006 12:51 PM |
| Flying Spur | SDNR | Continental Flying Spur | 15 | 01-24-2006 07:40 AM |
| Bentley is flying high. | Yannis | Automotive Sales & Business News | 6 | 12-20-2005 07:10 AM |
| Bentley Arnage T Vs. Bentley Flying Spur Vs. Maybach 57S | SDNR | Internal Combustion | 56 | 12-14-2005 02:39 AM |
| Bentley seems to be winning the "ultra-luxury" battle. | SDNR | The Bentley Lounge | 8 | 11-01-2005 05:49 PM |