| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur?This is a discussion on S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; I'm looking at the interior of the S65, and I most definitely think they could have done more. I like ... |
| View Poll Results: WHICH? | |||
| S65 AMG | | 28 | 59.57% |
| Flying Spur | | 19 | 40.43% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #51 |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,446
Thanks: 853
Thanked 1,278 Times in 515 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I'm looking at the interior of the S65, and I most definitely think they could have done more. I like the steering wheel, but the pedals don't look anything special at all. I'd like to see more design differentiation in AMG kits and the core models, it's more a subtle change right now. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #52 | |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,621
Thanks: 176
Thanked 696 Times in 350 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
I see what you are saying Roberto, but the thing is, for me (i'm sure it's not just me), a car with a brand such as Bentley (even if it is half German) now deserve to be in a league of their own. I'm with NSL on this one. A S65, as "special" as the car is, is just a beefed up S class, which can be found in every country in the world (the s class that is). A Bentley will always be something special. VIPs drive the Bentley. I can almost guarantee you that a non-car nut might just go for the Bentley just because it is a Bentley (as long as they can live with the styling), they won't care how many cylinders the thing has got. That alone, is enough to put the FS in a higher league... imo. | |
| | |
| | #53 | |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
__________________ . | |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I may be alone on this, but I really like the FS styling. I think its very elegant and very attractive-more so than the continental GT and the S class which is somewhat awkward IMO.
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() - It's not all that ugly.
__________________ . | |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 6,446
Thanks: 853
Thanked 1,278 Times in 515 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #57 | |||||
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
The Flying Spur doesn`t have half the technical advancments or safty records (I mean HALF) of what Mercedes has given the S-Class. It`s not a perception it`s a fact! Quote:
Lets not take thing out of context. I didn`t say the Bentley FS was re-badged VW Phaeton, nor did I say the Bentley Flying Spur was technically inferior. I said VW provided the undercarriage and some techical advancements for Bentley. I also said I don`t like that fact that the undercarriage comes from the Phaeton and that it weakens the image and I still stand by that. The S-Class doesn`t share it`s carriage with another car why should Bentley take that cost cutting approach. That shows as the FS doesn`t handle as well as the Bently GT coupe noted Top-Gear! Quote:
Thats pure rubbish! Mercedes-Benz invented the image for the luxury car long before Bentley came on the scene! it`s not that thay don`t do it as well but that thay do it differently with technical achievements and scientific research, that even Bentley has yet to bring to the table. The S-Class is the most popular luxury car in the world because of it`s innvations and achievements, This is it`s prestige and power known the world over for 40 years. It`s the numbers that make up the prestige at Mercedes-Benz. That image is quit different from the "old-world" romance offered by Bentley. Quote:
No, I remember the orignal article, the Flying Spur was created to take sales from the S500 and S600. Thay didn`t mention the S65 AMG. Quote:
Rubbish! The W220 S600 has a faster 0-60 time than the Bentley FS (0-60mph 4.8sec./ vs. 0-60 4.3sec. for the S600.) The W220 S65 as you know is even faster than the S600. The W221 S65 has improved ABC suspension, it`s brakes have also been recalibrated and it`s steering rack is said to be faster. I wouldn`t pass judgement so quickly. But, as I said before people who buy these car will not likley race them.
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. | |||||
| | |
| | #58 |
| Aficionado ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 323
Thanked 168 Times in 114 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? ^ 0-60 times don't really have anything to do with performance (more likely gear ratios and torque).
__________________ See this avatar... I made this shiz along with many others in the avatar bank.. you can thank me in worship.. |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,621
Thanks: 176
Thanked 696 Times in 350 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Saying that Benz is in the same league as a Bentley to me is like comparing an M3 to a McLaren F1. You can have more technology and safety, but these cars aren't in the same league! A Bentley is still a Bentley IMO. When people see the Bentley driving down a road, it's an event. The S65 is just another S class. See my point? Roberto, thanks a lot for those pics... wow, I haven't really paid attention to the FS but that black one looks fantastic. I know which car I'm going to pick now. |
| | |
| | #60 | |||||||
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
I was saying that it is just a perception that Bentley is viewed as an out-of-date, technical dinosaur - Bentleys, including the Arnage, are technically among the most advanced cars in the world. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ . Last edited by SDNR; 02-07-2006 at 11:22 PM. | |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bentley, flying, s65, spur |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Gear - Bentley Flying Spur. | Yannis | Sound and Vision | 7 | 02-07-2006 12:51 PM |
| Flying Spur | SDNR | Continental Flying Spur | 15 | 01-24-2006 07:40 AM |
| Bentley is flying high. | Yannis | Automotive Sales & Business News | 6 | 12-20-2005 07:10 AM |
| Bentley Arnage T Vs. Bentley Flying Spur Vs. Maybach 57S | SDNR | Internal Combustion | 56 | 12-14-2005 02:39 AM |
| Bentley seems to be winning the "ultra-luxury" battle. | SDNR | The Bentley Lounge | 8 | 11-01-2005 05:49 PM |