| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance PackageThis is a discussion on EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Final words. Indeed, both cars successfully balance hardcore horsepower with a tastefull palette of home comforts. As modern Teutonic interpretations ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,319 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Final words. Indeed, both cars successfully balance hardcore horsepower with a tastefull palette of home comforts. As modern Teutonic interpretations of the classic American muscle car, they make the case. If what you crave in your four-door saloon, for instance, is colossal perfrormance delivered with the demeanour of an insouciant dragster, the C63 is almost certainly what you are looking for. The depth of the M3's talent, however, is telling. For point-to-point pace it easily matches the Merc but, more than that, it feels special doing it - accurate, agile, finely balanced, biddable - where the Merc is merely accomplished. In short, the M3 saloon is sharper, cuts deeper and will keep you hooked for longer. Bedford laptimes: BMW M3: 1:26,2 Merc C63: 1:28,8 Source: Dr Dunkel ![]()
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Garage: E36 M3
VW Jetta
Subaru Legacy GT
Posts: 3,264
Thanks: 2,472
Thanked 1,164 Times in 696 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Long live the king . |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA Garage: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet
Posts: 15,642
Thanks: 5,226
Thanked 9,533 Times in 4,030 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Quote:
Hmmmm..... M
__________________ Merc1 Allstars: SLS, SL63, S65, SLK55, CL63, SL65 BS, E63, R8 5.2, S5, LP560, LP670, M3, Mulsne, BK, DBS, GT500, Gran S, 911, X6M, Z4, Veyron GS, XFR, XKR, ZR1, CC, GTI, CTSV, 458, 599. | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Merc1 For This Useful Post: | Tarek (09-25-2008) |
| | #4 |
| GCZ's High Court ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 AKA: Tycoon Garage: A naturally aspirated V8 mofo - 2008 BMW 550i
Posts: 17,706
Thanks: 7,878
Thanked 7,679 Times in 3,759 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package I'd love to see a full article of this one... ![]() ![]()
__________________ DSC Off - Steptronic On - KickDown! ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 417
Thanks: 65
Thanked 195 Times in 90 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package In the words of an AMG engineer, the average driver could explore the upper limits of the C63 with ease and more safely than he could in a M3. The M3's maximum performance plateau is very narrow and the average driver will find it very challenging to drive the M3 at the maximum for prolonged periods. It's not that the C63's chassis is inferior to the M3, it's just that they have been tuned differently to the taste of their respective clientele. |
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wunderkind For This Useful Post: |
| | #6 | |
| GCZ's High Court ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 AKA: Tycoon Garage: A naturally aspirated V8 mofo - 2008 BMW 550i
Posts: 17,706
Thanks: 7,878
Thanked 7,679 Times in 3,759 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Quote:
And in the end, if i'd need every day, comfortable car, an M3 would serve me good in that way too. ![]()
__________________ DSC Off - Steptronic On - KickDown! ![]() | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Garage: E36 M3
VW Jetta
Subaru Legacy GT
Posts: 3,264
Thanks: 2,472
Thanked 1,164 Times in 696 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Quote:
Looking at all the test videos and reviews we have seen I say it is the other way around with the C63 being the difficult car to handle at the limit and M3 being the more easily exploited. Of course it is normal the the AMG engineer thinks otherwise. And yes, the C63's chassis is inferior. AMG might or might not have deliberately made it that way, I have no clue but if it can't handle as well and is not as comfortable - that makes it inferior. | |
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sunny For This Useful Post: |
| | #8 |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA Garage: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet
Posts: 15,642
Thanks: 5,226
Thanked 9,533 Times in 4,030 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Scathing..... M
__________________ Merc1 Allstars: SLS, SL63, S65, SLK55, CL63, SL65 BS, E63, R8 5.2, S5, LP560, LP670, M3, Mulsne, BK, DBS, GT500, Gran S, 911, X6M, Z4, Veyron GS, XFR, XKR, ZR1, CC, GTI, CTSV, 458, 599. |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Merc1 For This Useful Post: | Tarek (09-25-2008) |
| | #9 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Garage: E36 M3
VW Jetta
Subaru Legacy GT
Posts: 3,264
Thanks: 2,472
Thanked 1,164 Times in 696 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package Truth sometimes is.... ![]() But I don't for a sec mean to imply C63 is a bad car or does not handle well. It is all relative I guess.. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 417
Thanks: 65
Thanked 195 Times in 90 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO: M3 E90 vs C63 Performance Package The AMG engineer made an example with the handling and grip of the two cars. The C63 is tuned to have a high level of grip and is designed to "let go" gradually even with the ASR switched to 'OFF' so the driver can drift a little (or a lot) and can control the drift with the throttle and catch it quite easily. Go to Youtube and you'll see countless videos with the C63 drifting like the tyres don't cost a cent. The M3 on the other hand, is designed for maximum adhesion (grip) and even professional drivers find the M3 difficult to drift and once the threshold is breached and it let's go, it really let's go. One point the AMG engineer did concede is that they need to work on the suspensions to give the C63 better ride comfort and they may improve the level of grip. It's not easy to achieve when you have an angry 6.2L V8 engine under the bonnet. |
| | |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Wunderkind For This Useful Post: | Benzboi_inoz (10-06-2008), Bilal (09-25-2008), Merc1 (09-25-2008), Mr. Mercedes (09-25-2008), Tarek (09-25-2008) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| c63, e90, evo, m3, package, performance |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wheels : BMW M3 vs Mercedes Benz C63 AMG | Monster | Internal Combustion | 13 | 05-09-2008 08:32 AM |
| Edmunds: Battle of the Bimmers | Deutsch | New BMW Models / Vehicles | 1 | 04-28-2008 10:28 AM |
| Press Release:THE FIRST-EVER BMW X6 SPORTS ACTIVITY COUPE | Bartek Sikorski | X6 SAC | 0 | 04-09-2008 09:36 PM |
| AMS: BMW M3 E90 vs Mercedes C63 AMG | dr Dunkel | Internal Combustion | 39 | 04-09-2008 03:38 PM |
| Sport Auto: Nürburgring Cornering Speeds | Bruce | Test Data | 11 | 10-19-2007 02:02 PM |