| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better?This is a discussion on BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Originally Posted by SCOTT27 Here I use my wealth of experience and my directness to the question. This is something ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Garage: 2007 RS4 Daytona Grey
2005 M6 Indianapolis Red
2008 ML 420 CDI Silver
Posts: 128
Thanks: 44
Thanked 145 Times in 40 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Quote:
![]()
__________________ You can't soar like an eagle if your flying with pigeons! | |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #22 |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Houston, Texas Garage: X5 4.8i/X6 50i
Posts: 1,292
Thanks: 391
Thanked 596 Times in 285 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Will a 5 litre V8 qualify as a high revving engine albeit 1 litre short.
__________________ Life is good |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 423
Thanked 540 Times in 295 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Total hogwash Scott. And the day a F/I M-car debuts is the day us Audi and Merc boys have our fun. ![]() |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 423
Thanked 540 Times in 295 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Cairo. Garage: Italian.
Posts: 6,955
Thanks: 4,528
Thanked 1,069 Times in 875 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Sweden Garage: 2009 MINI Cooper S
Posts: 4,852
Thanks: 2,721
Thanked 1,135 Times in 736 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Quote:
![]() And, no, for sure that was no giveaway on what car is on tap ;-)
__________________ Edmunds - Insideline We love a giant killer because it makes great headlines and there's always pressure to deliver an upset. | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Garage: QX56
Posts: 200
Thanks: 90
Thanked 61 Times in 39 Posts
![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? There's no comparison imho. What's there like three M cars on the market? I'm not sure but something tells me if Mercedes AMG was only focused on three models rather then there complete model line, BMW might not be coined the drivers car today! ![]() |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 423
Thanked 540 Times in 295 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2006 Location: Canada Garage: German cars
Posts: 846
Thanks: 0
Thanked 645 Times in 216 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Prior to the CLK63 Black Series and C63, M and AMG had very different philosophies regarding their high performance cars. In general, here are my observations: M division: - high revving, lower displacement, naturally aspirated powerplants that have high HP but relatively low torque, meaning the maximum accleration occurs at higher rpm's - generally lighter cars than the AMG equivalent - superior suspension tuning when it comes to handling and track capability, BUT it generally comes at a cost of a much more bumpy ride on the streets - available with manual transmission, better steering feel, better braking feel, and better weight distribution, all of which results in a superior driving pleasure/"feel"; more confidence inspiring when the car is pushed to its handling limits......this in my opinion DEFINES the M concept, which is to deliver the best driving fun and involvement -cars are better optimized for track work, while maintaining a degree of civility for everyday driving on the streets AMG division: - high displacement engines +/- supercharging or turbocharging producing massive torque at relatively low rpm......this in my opinion DEFINES the AMG concept......this philosophy delivers instant/immediate access to rapid acceleration that is easily exploited with everyday driving - suspension not tuned as aggressively such that the ride on everyday streets is generally superior/more comfortable to the M equivalent car, which results in a compromise in the handling ability - automatic gearbox is the only option (with manual shifting mode) - traction control/stability control which could not be completely disabled (only switched to a higher threshold before intervention).....safety took priority over complete driver control - cars are better optimized for street performance as opposed to track performance Since the introduction of the CLK63 Black Series and C63, AMG has tried to address the main criticism of their cars by making them more "involving" to drive and increase their handling capabilities. The result is a much more bumpy ride on the streets compared to previous AMG cars because of much stiffer suspension. With the 6.2L V8, AMG has achieved a high revving naturally aspirated concept while still retaining the relatively massive torque figures at relatively low rpm with high displacement. These newer AMG cars also have stability control systems that can be completely defeated. The new M3 is a good example of M's direction. With the adjustable dampers, the M3 is now a more comfortable daily driver compared to the C63, while it still remains superior in the handling department. Other than that, M division has remained on course with respect to its products. Which one is better? That depends on what you want in a performance car. For track work and "fun to drive" factor, M division is still superior (in general), but their cars' handling superiority cannot be really appreciated on everyday streets. For street driving, AMG cars' performance capabilities are still easier to exploit and enjoy.
__________________ 2004 A4 1.8T Avant Quattro 2005 C55 AMG 2008 135i M Sport |
| | |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PC Valkyrie For This Useful Post: | cawimmer430 (08-06-2008), Yaz (08-06-2008) |
| | #30 | |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,510
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 2,803 Times in 1,303 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: BMW ///M vs AMG, Who tunes better? Quote:
__________________ Now officially an engineer | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Monster For This Useful Post: | cawimmer430 (08-06-2008) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| amg, bmw, or or or m, tunes |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trendsetter and bestseller: The 500 000th BMW X3 rolls off the assembly line | Just_me | X3 SAV | 4 | 06-19-2008 03:18 AM |
| BMW to Bring Performance Aerodynamic Kit to Geneva Motor Show | Bartek Sikorski | 1 Series | 22 | 03-12-2008 08:10 AM |
| *The Mercedes-Benz FAQ Thread* (Brand History, Model Designations, Photos etc.) | cawimmer430 | The Mercedes-Benz Lounge | 1 | 02-13-2008 05:50 AM |
| BMW 3 Series and BMW 1 Series Performance Parts | Just_me | The BMW Lounge | 0 | 01-28-2008 01:45 AM |
| GermanCarScene: On The M3 | RICHBOY | 3 Series | 0 | 10-07-2007 02:09 PM |