| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMGThis is a discussion on Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Originally Posted by GTA8.5 It`s way too earily to tell JM, even if it will be heavier it will have ... |
| View Poll Results: Pick your favorite? | |||
| BMW M3 DCT Convertible | | 46 | 66.67% |
| MB CLK63 | | 23 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #51 | |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,558
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,329 Times in 3,005 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG Quote:
When next CLK63 comes the gap will be closer. I still believe next CLK will be heavier than current one. Its going to be larger and if it gets hardtop ala E93 then the weight will raise even higher.
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html | |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #52 |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 705
Thanks: 167
Thanked 83 Times in 62 Posts
![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG CLK for me. It has better side profile + it's faster. M3 is best as a coupe with carbon roof. ![]()
__________________ Designed by computer, built by robot, driven by moron. |
| | |
| | #53 | |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Wiltshire, UK Garage: Audi A4 1.9TDi quattro Sport
Posts: 254
Thanks: 319
Thanked 186 Times in 97 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG Quote:
Other than that I cannot see any advantages as far as the weather's concerned. My partner has a CLK 200 Convertible and last week we were out in it in a horrendous thunderstorm. The rain was torrential, bouncing off the road and causing flash floods in no time at all. Even with the wipers on full speed it was difficult to see clearly. There wasn't a single droplet of water anywhere in the car when we stopped; that roof is absolutely watertight. Last year a friend and I drove down the Le Mans in similar conditions (anyone who was there will know what I mean!) We were in his S4 Cabriolet and that was the same - completely dry inside even after being left standing in pouring rain for hours on end. IMO a well engineered soft top is equally as effective as a hard top in inclement weather.
__________________ 2003 Audi S4 saloon (gone but not forgotten...) 1998 Audi A4 1.9TDi quattro Sport saloon | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mockenrue For This Useful Post: | martinbo (05-16-2008) |
| | #54 |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,558
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,329 Times in 3,005 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG In Sweden real hardtop is better than cloth roof thanks to bad wheather and snowy winters. Personally I wouldnt buy a convertible since we only have summer like 3 months a year . Good things with hard-top is: - It will last long as the rest of the car - weatherproof - thieves can't knife it open - The hard-top is quieter - Visibility. (With the top in place, the convertible’s visibility is a good as a coupe.) - temperature insulation - better rigidity - better safety if you crash(?) Bad things: - weight - trunk space Of course there here might be a few exceptions...
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html Last edited by Just_me; 05-16-2008 at 12:10 PM. |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Sweden Garage: 2009 MINI Cooper S
Posts: 4,852
Thanks: 2,721
Thanked 1,135 Times in 736 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG Good points Andreas, only I have to say that Sweden is the ultimate convertible country... since you really need to take advantage of every possible ray of sunlight you don't want to get caught in traffic and not have the possibility to get some sun. ![]()
__________________ Edmunds - Insideline We love a giant killer because it makes great headlines and there's always pressure to deliver an upset. |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 219
Thanks: 58
Thanked 90 Times in 41 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG The CLK is a pricey and outdated car, but the 6.2 V8 makes it fly. That engine is a gem. |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 403
Thanked 463 Times in 279 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Autozeitung: M3 Convertible DCT vs CLK 63 AMG I also agree, great points JM.. thing is a 2+2 hardtop convertible is very hard to style. I would never buy one no matter how well it performs. A droptop has to look sexy, thats a must!
__________________ The world resists change yet without it there would be no progress. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 63, amg, autozeitung, clk, convertible, dct, m3 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mercedes-Benz CLK-DTM AMG Picture Thread | Alx | Mercedes-Benz Pictures | 187 | 05-24-2009 08:28 AM |
| F1 Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG Safety Car and C63 AMG Wagon Medical Car | Merc1 | Formula 1 | 28 | 03-16-2008 02:22 PM |
| Sport Auto: Hockenheim Cornering Speeds (+ Zielgerade) | Bruce | Test Data | 19 | 04-22-2007 11:31 AM |
| I'm going to make an FAQ for Mercedes-Benz Lounge need your help ? | phaeton | The Mercedes-Benz Lounge | 18 | 12-28-2006 06:45 PM |