 | | | | | Contributor
Posts: 12,284 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA I drive: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet Thanks: 3,696
Thanked 6,579 Times in 2,847 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 02:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me I have no idea what you are fishing for. You might be a little too protective now. Some prefer shallowness, some prefer driving emotions. I prefer the latter one. | I'll take that as a yes then. Driving emotions? Thats a new one. I seriously doubt any car here drives like crap. So you're shallow if you want to like how you car looks as opposed to having a "high reving engine".
M | | | | | Me for President
Posts: 18,430 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden I drive: Rear Wheel Drive Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 5,864 Times in 2,431 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc1 I'll take that as a yes then. Driving emotions? Thats a new one. I seriously doubt any car here drives like crap. So you're shallow if you want to like how you car looks.
M | haha merc, you are unbelivable.  No cars drive like crap, even Volvo C30 drives well.
If you are looking for another 3 pages discussions with arguments you should talk to Eni. You two seem to love that
Sorry but I have to go back to work. Its a new lovely day here in Sweden. | | | | | Contributor
Posts: 12,284 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA I drive: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet Thanks: 3,696
Thanked 6,579 Times in 2,847 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me haha merc, you are unbelivable.  No cars drive like crap, even Volvo C30 drives well.
If you are looking for another 3 pages discussions with arguments you should talk to Eni. You two seem to love that  | I don't know what you're talking about. I just asked a simple question, yet you so convinced of something much broader a conspiracy or something.
I just find it interesting that other peoples preferences are shallow, like styling, but wanting "driving emotion" isn't. Seems to imply that other other cars aren't capable of giving one "driving emotion", is what I'm addressing when I said no other car here drives like crap.
M | | | | | Aficionado
Posts: 4,375 Join Date: Jan 2006 Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 853 Times in 585 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me Many people on this board seem to care about looks thats what I call shallow. I prefer how a car feels to drive. I like emotions better. | C'mon just me...the C63 and any other car on this list has enough "emotions" to make most of us sweat on track. As for buying a car for it's looks. Well no shit. I don't care how fast it goes, but you wouldn't see me driving a turd around town. LOL
If owning something beautiful makes me shallow than I'm shallow as hell. | | | | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NarutoRamen For This Useful Post: | | | Me for President
Posts: 18,430 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden I drive: Rear Wheel Drive Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 5,864 Times in 2,431 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc1 I don't know what you're talking about. I just asked a simple question, yet you so convinced of something much broader a conspiracy or something.
I just find it interesting that other peoples preferences are shallow, like styling, but wanting "driving emotion" isn't. Seems to imply that other other cars aren't capable of giving one "driving emotion", is what I'm addressing when I said no other car here drives like crap.
M | I wrote a comment about shallow and hell breakes lose. To me design and how a car is to drive is two different things. Maybe you can use the word shallow when it comes to driving as well. I dont know but to me shallow is about beauty. "Shallow Hall" with Frank Black is a fun movie by the way.
I'll will be driving the C63 in September and will give you my impressions.
I already driven the new M3 and as a total package the car is wonderful. Engine, balance , steering, handling and road feel is awesome.
C63 is a great machine as well but on its own way. As told before I will be driving C63 in September and I will let you know if I like it as good as I like the M3.
But for now M3 gets my vote mostly becuase how the car is to drive  | | | | | Me for President
Posts: 18,430 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden I drive: Rear Wheel Drive Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 5,864 Times in 2,431 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NarutoRamen C'mon just me...the C63 and any other car on this list has enough "emotions" to make most of us sweat on track. | I havent said otherwise Naruto  I never said C63 is a boring car, heck I can have fun with a Volvo C30 as well.
When will you be driving the new M3? | | | | | Aficionado
Posts: 4,375 Join Date: Jan 2006 Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 853 Times in 585 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me I havent said otherwise Naruto  I never said C63 is a boring car, heck I can have fun with a Volvo C30 as well.
When will you be driving the new M3? | I didn't say thats what you're saying. I was just trying to get a point across. Sorry if I came off as an ass.
As for the M3. If everything works out correctly...on June 10th....I can't wait! | | | | | Me for President
Posts: 18,430 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden I drive: Rear Wheel Drive Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 5,864 Times in 2,431 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NarutoRamen I didn't say thats what you're saying. I was just trying to get a point across. Sorry if I came off as an ass.
As for the M3. If everything works out correctly...on June 10th....I can't wait! | Lol you arent an ass. You are just my beyotch   j/k | | | | | Aficionado
Posts: 4,375 Join Date: Jan 2006 Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 853 Times in 585 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me Lol you arent an ass. You are just my beyotch  j/k | you can't expose me like that on "teh interwebs"  | | | | | Contributor
Posts: 12,284 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA I drive: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet Thanks: 3,696
Thanked 6,579 Times in 2,847 Posts
| Re: R&T Ultimate Sedan Comparison -
05-15-2008, 03:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_me I wrote a comment about shallow and hell breakes lose. To me design and how a car is to drive is two different things. Maybe you can use the word shallow when it comes to driving as well. I dont know but to me shallow is about beauty. "Shallow Hall" with Frank Black is a fun movie by the way.
I'll will be driving the C63 in September and will give you my impressions.
I already driven the new M3 and as a total package the car is wonderful. Engine, balance , steering, handling and road feel is awesome.
C63 is a great machine as well but on its own way. As told before I will be driving C63 in September and I will let you know if I like it as good as I like the M3.
But for now M3 gets my vote mostly becuase how the car is to drive  |
Saying you prefer a car for the way it drives is much better than saying that someone who likes styling is shallow.
Can't wait to read your impressions of the C63.
M | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to Merc1 For This Useful Post: | | |