| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2.0TDIThis is a discussion on AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2.0TDI within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Test by AutoZeitung: Modell .. 320d . C220CDI .. 9-3 1.9TTiD .. RS 2.0TDI Body ........ 684 . .. 712 .... ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 307
Thanks: 463
Thanked 861 Times in 188 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2.0TDI Test by AutoZeitung: Modell .. 320d . C220CDI .. 9-3 1.9TTiD .. RS 2.0TDI Body ........ 684 . .. 712 .... 663 704 Comfort . 728 742 .. 695 687 Driveline .. 728 694 . . 682 . . 703 Driving .. 619 . 604 568 . 602 Cost ... 405 . 389 . 394 . 445 Total ... 3 164 .. 3 141 3 002 3 141 Weight ... 1600 .. 1680 .. 1660 1500 0-100km/h 8,3 ... 8,4 . 9,0 8,3 Slalom (km/h) . 62,8 61,3 ... 60,8 . . 61,7 Lap time .. 1:53,4 .. 1:55,7 . 1:55,3 1:53,4 Consumtion .. 6,4 .... 7,9 7,5 7,1 Hp ..... 177 .. 170 180 170 Nm .... .. 350 400 .. 400 350 Test results: 1. BMW 320d touring 3 164 points 2. Mercedes V220CDI T 3 141 points 2. Skoda Octavia RS 2.9TDI 3 141 points 4. Saab 9-3 SportCombi 1.9 TTiD 3 002 points ![]() |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,621
Thanks: 176
Thanked 696 Times in 350 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. 2.0 liter BMW diesel engine= marvelous. Look at how much lower the consumption is compared to the others. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,321 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Intresting that my petrol babybimmer drink less fuel than a diesel Benz ![]()
__________________ BMW M (thats for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: London Garage: 2009 Leon Cupra K1 360bhp+ 490NM+, more to come
Posts: 944
Thanks: 158
Thanked 219 Times in 127 Posts
![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Give me the skoda. It looks really cool, performs well and is nice to the pocket. Plus not every man and his dog has one like with the BMW in my country. ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Glasgow for now Garage: Saab 9-3
Posts: 2,525
Thanks: 179
Thanked 918 Times in 480 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. You know what, out of this bunch I'd probably go for the Skoda too - the price/value for money advantage it has over the Merc and the Bimmer is too hard to ignore.
__________________ Fashion fades, only style remains the same. ― Coco Chanel |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| The Photo Phanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Munich, Germany Garage: '08 BMW 118i
Posts: 12,989
Thanks: 10,451
Thanked 9,147 Times in 3,289 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Quote:
The fuel consumption of my sister's 118i is absolutely horrible. For 100 km we generally get 9-10 L - far off from what BMW claims this thing is supposed to consume. Just last Thursday I drove my neighbour to Wels, Austria which is about 139 km from my town. The fuel tank was on full. I used country roads and NO AUTOBAHNS, drove completely normal and relaxed and when I drove us back to my town the fuel tank was half full. I kid you not. ![]() Heck our E320, which is heavier, more powerful and has only a 5-speed automatic is more fuel efficient. ![]() Any idea what's wrong here? My dad is pretty pissed about this. ![]()
__________________ CWPhotography | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Global Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 9,520
Thanks: 10,333
Thanked 9,854 Times in 4,064 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm sorry to hear that - the fuel consumption of your sisters 1-series is as bad as the consumption of our Scenic 2.0... ...maybe it's because of the 6 speed automatic or many city driving???! I have absolutely no idea - but you could give it back to the dealer because of the bad consumption! ![]() Buy a Saab 9-3 - in my opinion it's better looking anyway. ![]() So, have to do sth. for university again... ![]()
__________________ "Nothing will make a driver more faithful to a car, than a car that is faithful to its driver." | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| The Photo Phanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Munich, Germany Garage: '08 BMW 118i
Posts: 12,989
Thanks: 10,451
Thanked 9,147 Times in 3,289 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Quote:
![]() I don't know what to think if it is the fault of the automatic. According to the BMW brochures the automatic 118i should only consume a little more than a manual 118i. I mean even at cruising speed on the Autobahn (around 130 km/h) does the fuel economy suck. When I drove my sister to Bruchsal from my town we spent 80% of the route on the Autobahn A8. I engaged cruise control and let the car drive between 120-130 km/h depending on the speed limits. You can literally see the fuel clock go down and down every 20 minutes, literally. ![]() Our driving style is "normal". When I drive the 118i I generally don't abuse it or slam the pedal. I tap the pedal lightly and accelerate gently, not briskly. When I see the light at a crossing is red I don't accelerate but take my foot off the gas pedal and let the car roll out only braking if I have too to avoid crossing the line or hitting a car if it is infront of me. It's still a fun and great car in all aspects. Only the fuel economy is terrible. ![]()
__________________ CWPhotography | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,321 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Quote:
Maybe you didnt follow the drive-in periode properly What can I say, maybe it will get better whne you have put on more miles on the car ![]()
__________________ BMW M (thats for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| The Photo Phanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Munich, Germany Garage: '08 BMW 118i
Posts: 12,989
Thanks: 10,451
Thanked 9,147 Times in 3,289 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AZ: BMW 320d touring vs MB C220CDIT vs Saab 9-3 SC 1.9TTiD vs Skoda Octavia RS 2. Quote:
![]() I told my sister to insist on getting a manual but she and my mom were in favor of an automatic. My mom thinks it "safer" because you have both hands on the wheel. You don't want to know what I think when I hear this! ![]()
__________________ CWPhotography | |
| | |