M3 was a massive 5 secs faster than the other 2. Hardly any gap between the Merc and the Audi. But the Audi looked much more tidier and cleaner around the track than the C63 which looked handful even for Stig and way out of shape at almost every turn. And what is worse, it destroyed its tires to the cords. It was faster in a straight line though.

M3: 2.38.9
C63: 2.43.5
RS4: 2.43.9

Here are the videos (from M3 post):

Part 1:


Part 2:


Part 3:

Hahhahahahahhahah!! Can't stop laughing!

quote: BMW owners has no friends! ah hahhhhaha!
last when Jeremy dress like a BMW owner - I agree 110%

Haha that was so funny!

>
^ The old F1 car was still faster.

Looked like great fun!

No wonder the tires on the Mercedes looked a bit worn...

Those are awesome machines! I would prefer the C-Class - just because of its sound...

C63 looks gr8 in white!

I would take the merc. I wonder what tires the BMW was wearing compared to the competition though as from what most reviews have said there isnt much between the C63 and the M3.

It's a pitty they do not tell. All three have R-tire options and for the sake of comparison they should all have the same.

The only other side by side track test I have seen was the one by Evo and that was performed on a wet track and none of the cars was using r-tires. The result was about the same as here.

plz guyz post another video link as youtube is not working here

Great results for M3.

Where is the RS5 ? Can't wait.