Quote:
Originally Posted by dr Dunkel This is very true! The M3 is the natural choice for the driver who seeks the most rewarding driving dynamics in the class. Maybe the C63 desperately needs the sport package to get its balance (and pace) but then it will even further compromise its on-the-road capabilities. It will for sure make it quicker on track but im guessing (judging from the first Evo review when the C63 was presented - the journalists got to drive a non sport package car on ordinary roads and a sport package car on track) that it then will border on the level of hardcore represented by the previous generation CSL and that will not be too popular with expecially English magazines like Evo who find ordinary road capabilities very important.
Edit: I did not mean to say the C63 was a bad car in any way, just that it - thank god - is different from the M3. |
I'm doubtful that the performance pack can change the nature of the C63. The masculine steering wheel, aggressive DTM styling tells the story. MB wanted the C63 to be a small car with a big V8 and four wheels, simple and brutal without any advanced gizmos. Same old story with the Z4 and Boxster, one is wild and the other one precise Boxster. The reason why the C63 went around the track faster than the M3 is because it isn't able to get 100% of all the power coming from the meaty engine, down to the ground, much of it is lost in tire spin.
Neither of all three cars has a major advantage over the others. They are like peaches, apricot and plumbs. There's one for everyone.