| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 AeroThis is a discussion on Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero within the Internal Combustion forums, part of the Website Forums category; Originally Posted by BMW_Dude Did you know that 83.9% of percentages are made up on the spot! Hahaha! Post of ... |
| View Poll Results: Pick your choice? | |||
| BMW 120i (facelift) | | 58 | 69.88% |
| Saab 9-3 Aero | | 25 | 30.12% |
| Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | |
| Global Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 11,274
Thanks: 7,458
Thanked 4,920 Times in 2,733 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
Anyways, I'm not overly familiar with either of these vehicles, but I know I'd go with the 120i. | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce For This Useful Post: | BMW_Dude (04-23-2007) |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #22 |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,319 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero I dont like A3, I rather be driving a A4, the 2.0T but still little expensive for me if I want a car with low miles.
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Greece
Posts: 6,031
Thanks: 1,726
Thanked 1,318 Times in 808 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
To begin with, you have to know, that a car is not only driving experience, but i think you are grown enough to know it Anyway, before making any choise you have to think of some things, like: 1. Which of those cars suits your lifestyle the most. Will you be using your car most of the time as "fun equipment" or as a "tool" that makes your life easier. 2. You are planning to keep your car for a long time. So think of what will you need from your car in like 5 or 8 years time and if you will be able to afford a second car by that time. 3. Buying a new car, means that it will have much equipment. If you get a striped out car you will get bored of it easily. 4. First make your mind about the car you will buy, and then look for the best deal in the market. This will make your life a lot easier (trust me on this). 5. Make your mind on if you are planning to make any mods on the car after some time. 6. The dealer you will have to work with (service and stuff) is very important. I hate to say that, but i regret buying a volvo simply because the service dealer is really really bad. Once i had to take legal action to get my car fixed. Now, after answering those questions, i will state my opinion. > Go for the Saab. Reasons, pros and cons: 1. It is a medium sized family sedan and it is much practical, thing that you will actually appreciate later. (same happend with me) If you will have to leave with the 1er for many years, you will feel lack of space in some months! 2. Driving experience is not the only criteria when in the market for a new car. If you are planning on getting married/ having a child, while owning one from those cars, go for the Saab. You will just need it. (for once again, this happens to me as well) 3. I know from first hand that with the same money, you get a Saab with more HP and way more equipment. So go for the Saab. 4. After all, the Saab is not terrible when it comes to driving dynamics. The 2.0T with the 175HP i have driven, handles very well and it is surprising well. Off course, it can't match the 120 and it's gearbox could be much better. But think of the rest you get. 5. But if you want, even your 5 minutes drive to work to be as fun as hell, then go for the Bimmer. The 9-3 doesn't offer easily driving thrill, but it is way more practical and better equiped. So, we are actually in a kind of crossroad. 6. Based on what you are planning to do when you don't need the car anymore, i think that the Bimmer has better resale value, but that not the most important thing. 7. After driving a Volvo for two years, and mind that it is BORING, i can say that you can have much fun in straightline/ highway with any car that does 0-100 in less than 10 secs. Anyway, i hope that i helped. Feel free to discuss it further. ![]()
__________________ Giannis - Born of jets | |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Giannis For This Useful Post: | Just_me (04-23-2007) |
| | #24 | |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,319 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
No, I havent driven the new 9-3 Aero, only the old generation. But I hear from people the chassi is very good and car is kinda fun to drive and if you buy Aero, sportchassi is included. I need to check out the Saab realibility, cause realibility is important to me. All I know the first year (2003-2004) was really bad year for saab 9-3 so I need to buy a -05 or newer. 120i has a nice advantage, the fuel consumption is low, only 0.64 liters/mil which is good for a 170hp car and a redline at 7000 rpm . Free service for 4 years or 8000 mil, another good advantage.
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html | |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Executive ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London.
Posts: 15,766
Thanks: 2,322
Thanked 4,469 Times in 2,239 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
As for the car being fun to drive? Who have you heard it from, Sweden or Robert Colin at Aftonbladet? My point is that people in Sweden love Volvo and Saab and if you ask them, many will even tell you that a V70 is fun to drive. If you even haven't driven a 9-3 then I think you should do it as fast as possible. IMO you can't really decide on buying a car if you don't know what it feels like to drive it. A test drive always make or break the deal. | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Manchester, UK Garage: 07 Passat Variant V6
Posts: 1,679
Thanks: 1,050
Thanked 1,124 Times in 524 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Once you have driven the current Vectra, you will have an idea of what the current 9-3 feels like to drive. Overlight steering, nose heavy Diesels and harsh ride on the sporty versions.
__________________ "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe". Albert Einstein |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,319 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
I read it in AMS and Teknikens Värld. I remember AMS said 9-3 Aero was a "drivers car" when they compared it to S60 T5. Från slalomtest om Aero , Citat "Snabb och kommunikativ styrning, välavstämt chassi med näst intill överstyrd balans. 70km/h mellan konerna är inget problem oavsett om antisladdystemet är i eller ur". Dock tyckte de inte motorn var lika bra som vägegenskaperna. Oh I just remembered my cousin own a new Saab 9-3 2.0T (175hp), I.ll ask him next time for a drive but its an automatic ![]()
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Me for President ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Garage: Rear Wheel Drive
Posts: 20,548
Thanks: 1,537
Thanked 7,319 Times in 3,003 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
Also, im not buying a diesel and harsh ride, no problem at all, I prefer it more harsh drive than comfortable drive. ![]()
__________________ BMW M (that’s for Marketing, not Motorsport) Post your BMW Frankfurt photos here: http://www.germancarzone.com/bmw-lou...re-thread.html | |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Executive ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London.
Posts: 15,766
Thanks: 2,322
Thanked 4,469 Times in 2,239 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Journeyman ![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,535
Thanks: 6,012
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,204 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Your opinion: BMW 120i (FL) vs Saab 9-3 Aero Quote:
Also the baggage space in the 1er will be too little for a longer journey like if you want to drive to Denmark or Germany. For these reasons I'd take the Saab. BTW why aren't you considering used E90 or A4 1.8T?Last edited by bmer; 04-24-2007 at 01:04 AM. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 120i, 93, aéro, bmw, fl, opinion, saab |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| List: Sultan of Brunei's complete car collection | Just_me | The Pit - General Discussion | 128 | 05-18-2009 12:26 PM |
| Sport Auto: Nürburgring Cornering Speeds | Bruce | Test Data | 11 | 10-19-2007 02:02 PM |
| Factory 0-60 and 1/4mile Times | Choleric | Test Data | 3 | 07-14-2007 03:39 PM |
| Sport Auto: Hockenheim Cornering Speeds (+ Zielgerade) | Bruce | Test Data | 19 | 04-22-2007 11:31 AM |