| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70This is a discussion on Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70 within the Golf/Jetta/GTI/Rabbit/Eos forums, part of the Volkswagen category; I'm not sure exactly when it happened but at some point in the last few years, convertibles stopped being fun ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Journeyman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 AKA: vroom_vroom Location: England Garage: Vauxhall Corsa
Posts: 4,789
Thanks: 4,575
Thanked 1,620 Times in 1,034 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70 ![]() I'm not sure exactly when it happened but at some point in the last few years, convertibles stopped being fun and grew up. I suspect the process began with the original Mercedes SLK which reintroduced the long-forgotten concept of a folding metal roof and turned ragtops back into tintops. This of course is a good thing if you happen to live in one of our towns or cities, which according to the home secretary are home to gangs of drug and alcohol crazed teenaged thugs roaming the streets like latter day velociraptors, making any car with a soft canvas skin apotential target. There is an ever burgeoning list of these so called coupe convertibles; I haven't counted them up but I suspect they now outnumber their traditional cloth-roofed counterparts by some margin. The problem however is that these cars shift the emphasis from the convertible to the coupe and this is how many of them spend their lives; as rather ungainly tin-tops. In an old school convertible there was little point in keeping the hood up because it made so little difference. Traditional canvas hoods leaked like a government department and deafened you like an X-Factor reject and this was all for the good, it encouraged owners to drive topless, as it were. Today the temptation is to keep the metal top in place and crank up the heated seats. So which one will we warm to? C70: Engine 2.4-litre 5-cyl turbodiesel Power (bhp) 178 Torque (lb/ft) 295 0-62mph (secs) 8.8 Top speed (mph) 140 Combined MPG 38.7 CO2 (g/km)/tax (%) 196/28 List price from £33,130 Eos: Engine 2.0-litre, four-cylinder Power (bhp) 138 Torque (lb/ft) 236 0-62mph (secs) 10.4 Top speed (mph) 127 Combined MPG 47.1 CO2 (g/km)/tax (%) 158/23 List price £22,647 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70Â -Â Twin-tests of new cars | MSN Cars UK
__________________ Audi - Always Leads, Never Follows. |
| | |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to VroomVroom For This Useful Post: | cawimmer430 (02-24-2008), hussein (03-06-2008), Merc1 (02-22-2008), paagomes (09-07-2008), phaeton (02-25-2008) |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA Garage: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet
Posts: 15,642
Thanks: 5,226
Thanked 9,533 Times in 4,030 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70 As much as I like VWs, I'd take the Volvo. The VW has a better interior in this test, but Volvo has always looked like a real coupe instead of a hardtop convertible like the VW. The Volvo's roof looks better intergrated/resolved. M
__________________ Merc1 Allstars: SLS, SL63, S65, SLK55, CL63, SL65 BS, E63, R8 5.2, S5, LP560, LP670, M3, Mulsne, BK, DBS, GT500, Gran S, 911, X6M, Z4, Veyron GS, XFR, XKR, ZR1, CC, GTI, CTSV, 458, 599. Last edited by Merc1; 02-22-2008 at 05:03 AM. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Journeyman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 AKA: vroom_vroom Location: England Garage: Vauxhall Corsa
Posts: 4,789
Thanks: 4,575
Thanked 1,620 Times in 1,034 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70 Quote:
![]()
__________________ Audi - Always Leads, Never Follows. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| The Photo Phanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Munich, Germany Garage: '08 BMW 118i
Posts: 12,992
Thanks: 10,452
Thanked 9,148 Times in 3,290 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Twin test: VW Eos v Volvo C70 Both are great little cars. I'd probably go for the Volvo as it looks sleeker and "less girly" and also less chubby than the Eos. ![]()
__________________ CWPhotography |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| c70, eos, test, twin, volvo, vw |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canadian Driver - Test Drive: 2007 Volvo C70 | Merc1 | Volvo | 1 | 10-19-2007 07:23 AM |
| Edmunds Inside Line - Comparison Test: 2007 Mini Cooper S vs. 2008 Volvo C30 | Merc1 | Internal Combustion | 1 | 08-27-2007 05:16 AM |
| Edmunds Inside Line - Full Test: 2008 Volvo C30 | Merc1 | Volvo | 4 | 08-08-2007 11:50 PM |
| Autobild: BMW 335i Convert. vs VW EOS vs Audi A4 vs Volvo C70 | Just_me | Internal Combustion | 17 | 04-20-2007 06:40 AM |
| VW Eos vs Volvo C70 | far2000 | Golf/Jetta/GTI/Rabbit/Eos | 0 | 04-18-2007 07:52 AM |