Bruce

"Is 507 horsepower enough to make a wagon cool? It’s enough for a lot of things."

BY JARED GALL, November 2006
Orignal link - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


"The big knock against station wagons is that they are uncool, that an SUV is a more interesting way to transport maximum peoples and stuff. Who wants their kids to be laughed at when their friends see them being picked up from school in a lame-o mommy-mobile?

Let us suggest a solution: pick up the kids in an E63 wagon. Pull up to the curb, brake-torque the Benz, start the rear hides a-boilin’, and invite the laughing bullies to climb in. Lift the brake, mash the gas, and lay a two hundred foot patch out of the school parking lot. Let the rears gather traction and you’ll rocket to 60 mph in four seconds flat on your way to one very-difficult-to-clean back seat and a 12.5-second quarter-mile at 115 mph. In the time it takes the young ones to sing the ABCs, the E63 will be whipping along at the 155-mph governor. No way the parents in the pristine SUV are cooler…when was the last time the carpool included mud bogging or rock crawling?



The E63 is a mild evolution of the E55 gonzo-wagon. The supercharged-and-intercooled 5.4-liter V-8 from the Mercedes mothership is gone, replaced by AMG’s own 6.2-liter naturally-aspirated mill. Although the new engine gives up 62 lb-ft of torque to the old, supercharged V-8, there’s an extra 38-hp on tap and 800 additional rpm before redline, tallying a screaming 7200. The 6.2 negligibly outperforms the old car in every acceleration test, reaching 100 mph in 9.5 and 150 in 23.5 seconds; 0.2, and 0.5 seconds quicker. The 12.5-second quarter-mile time is identical between the two cars, but the 63 carries one extra mph through the lights.



The monster-in-the-closet motor is harnessed to the smooth seven-speed automatic transmission, with real paddles for manual shifting replacing the old buttons on the back of the steering wheel. However, the manual shifting function is still clearly no priority at Mercedes, as tugs on the paddle for upshifts are treated as suggestions and there is not even a hint of a manual-wannabe rev matching on downshifts, as there is with some other luxury- and sports-car transmissions. It’s nothing special as a manumatic, but as a regular automatic it’s smooth, responsive, and happy to drop a couple gears, making passing on a two-lane so fun you’ll want to pull over and let everyone by, just to do it again.



Externally, cues that the wagon that just dusted your 911 is the newer model are few. The 2007 model gets different wheels and a revised front fascia, although it takes a close look to notice. And the fibber tags on the fenders now read “6.3 AMG” instead of the old “Kompressor” badges. Of course, none of this will be visible from 300 feet back at 115 mph.

Likewise, interior touches are few, limited to a new steering wheel and shifter, and a couple of climate control buttons that have migrated. Underneath, the E63 is the same as the old E55, but no complaints there. A two-ton wagon is never going to carve corners like a Lotus, but good luck fitting seven complete people into an Elise. The E63’s 0.84 g is good enough to suck barf out of baby’s mouth and directly onto the outside window, thus protecting the leather.



This automotive equivalent of the old spring-snakes-in-a-peanut-can trick doesn’t come cheap. At $92,675, the car we drove included the $3,900 Premium II package, which includes keyless go, the COMAND navigation system, ventilated front seats, and rear window blinds. But as a legitimate twofer that could replace both the Corvette (base price $44,995) and the SUV ($55,120 for a Cadillac Escalade) it’s practically a bargain. All together now: there’s nothing wrong with station wagons. May the E63 lead the revolution!"

Fast Touring wagon too!

Specifications

Vehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 5-door wagon
Price as tested: $92,675 (base price: $88,775)
Engine type: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208c
Power (SAE net): 507 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

Transmission: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
Wheelbase: 112.4 in
Length/width/height: 192.3/71.7/59.3 in
Curb weight: 4499 lb

Zero to 60 mph: 4.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 23.5 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.5 sec @ 115 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 155 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.84 g
EPA fuel economy, city/highway: 14/20 mpg
C/D-observed fuel economy: 13 mpg

Merc1

The 0-60 numbers are getting ridiculous. First the CLS63 at 4.1 seconds which was .1 secs faster than the previous CLS55 and how this. The E63 faster by .1 of a sec than the previous E55 wagon!

M

klier

I seriously love this car

The M5 Touring can't come soon enough. I'd love to read a test between those two monsters!

But, 4.0 seconds from 0-60? That's like 4.1/4.2 sec. to 62 MPH right?

Holy Hell, much faster than M5 bro!

Bruce

Yeah, i'm with you The E63 is my favourite saloon but i might be inclinded to purchase the Touring over the saloon

Yeah about that, it's one fast Touring wagon !!

Just_me

didnt same carmag test the CLS63 recently?

Does anyone remember the numbers for CLS63?
Zero to 60 mph: xxx sec
Zero to 100 mph: xxx sec
Zero to 150 mph: xxxx sec

Bruce

Actually yeah, you did Strange numbers i must admit, as usual from Car & Driver.

"CLS 55
0-60 4.2
0-100 9.8
0-150 24.9
1/4mile 12.6@114

CLS 63
0-60 4.1
0-100 9.8
0-150 23.5
1/4mile - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER"

Merc1

Yep, the 0-60 times for the CLS63 was 4.1 secs! Not sure about the other times.

M

ree

This car is a monster!!! A family car with a sound, which gives you the creep.
Someone in our neighbourhood is driving a E 55 T AMG and a SL 550. Damn, both cars sound so brutal.

Beemer B773ER

Well you can be sure the roar of this engine will mute out the kids fighting in the backseat!

I'd have a really tough time decided between the E63 and E63 Touring if there was a poll up here. I'm not too fussed about the brutal acceleration numbers and the fact that they're improved over the E55, because seriously the E55 was fast enough for me anyway.

Im lovin' this line: ...and happy to drop a couple gears, making passing on a two-lane so fun you’ll want to pull over and let everyone by, just to do it again.

I though I'd put C&D's CLS63 figures and info' up too. I'm still puzzled as to how the E63 Touring manages to do the 0-60mph, 0-100mph and Standing ¼-mile sprints quicker than the CLS63 when the E63T has a higher curb weight..?

Vehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door sedan
Price as tested: $100,805 (base price: $95,575)
Engine type: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208cc
Power (SAE net): 507 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 465 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

Transmission: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
Wheelbase: 112.4 in
Length/width/height: 194.0/73.7/54.7 in
Curb weight: 4366 lb

Zero to 60 mph: 4.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.8 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 23.5 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.4 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.6 sec @ 114 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 158 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 163 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g
EPA fuel economy, city/highway: 13/20 mpg
C/D-observed fuel economy: 13 mpg

Link to this info: - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Beemer B773ER

I think one of the reasons may be the weight distribution of the E63T. It probably has a bit more weight over and past the rear axle, and I'm guessing this aids in getting the tires to gain traction just that bit quicker.

But then you have a look at the 'Street start, 5–60 mph' times and still the E63T outdoes the CLS63 by 0.1sec.

Any explainations guys... coz I'm puzzled..??