| |||||||
| Home | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
[pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 SThis is a discussion on [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S within the Car Picture Threads forums, part of the Website Forums category; Fantastic. Do you know I have been looking for new pictures of that Arnage limousine for so long ....it is ... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S Fantastic. Do you know I have been looking for new pictures of that Arnage limousine for so long ....it is a lot prettier than the other two. All three cars look amazing in those pictures.
__________________ . Last edited by SDNR; 12-09-2007 at 10:19 PM. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #12 | ||
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S Quote:
Quote:
There is only one choice for me here though ....it's the Phantom without a doubt. ![]()
__________________ . | ||
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to SDNR For This Useful Post: | Bruce (12-09-2007) |
| | #13 |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Montreal, Canada Garage: 2008 M5, 2009 X5, 2008 335i convertible
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 3,379
Thanked 7,562 Times in 3,229 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S Great pics. They all look nice and came with individual pack, so it’s very difficult to say which is better or nicer. My choice would be RR for its stylish exterior and more choices for prettier "woody" interior.
__________________ M -The most powerful letter in the world |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 AKA: AlxAmg Location: --Poconos, PA.-- 2005 Aston Martin DB9 Garage: I ♣ SEALS
Posts: 6,238
Thanks: 1,806
Thanked 1,007 Times in 442 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Should have made this a poll.... VERY NICE CHOICES.... Love the Arnage interior, amazing, preffer the Phanton exterior becasue of its aggresiveness overall, but the interior is the blandest of the three.... Thus my choice, the Super stunning Maybach 62 S. Holy Sh*t, that is one hot car exterior and interior combined... Especially the white one Mr.Ree chose to display... WOW... Perfect for my type of drive and style. Great thread, thanks!!! ![]()
__________________ ---> The Road to Hell is Paved With Good Intentions.... |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Sydney
Posts: 4,510
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 2,803 Times in 1,303 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S It seems like both RR and Maybach understands that to create a luxury interior, you don't have to cover every single inch of the interior with wood, like the Bentley. It is just too excessive, and the overall effect is that they simply want to put the maximum amount of wood in there
__________________ Now officially an engineer |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S ^^But that is the way Rolls and Bentley have always done it ...it is one of the virtues of the brand -- I think this particular blond colour wood is not the most elegant choice. The Arnage is actually looking very out-of-date ...and the Maybach is charmless to me. I agree with Alex that the Rolls interior looks bland in the pictures ...but it certainly in not bland IRL. Besides, there are plenty of options one can get in the Rolls to make it more interesting. And the Rolls has individual TVs (unlike the Bentley) and larger than the Maybach's. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: A French in Bucharest Garage: 1974 Mercedes-Benz 450 SLC
Posts: 3,796
Thanks: 1,500
Thanked 1,829 Times in 1,025 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S Bentley for me, no doubt....Stunning car. The only one that appeal to me. But with a darker wood please! It is old-fashioned, like I like. Not harsh or aggressive looking like the Rolls, not cold-modern like the MM...Just perfect. Old-school limo. The MM interior looks busy, with things everywhere without any design or order in that pic...But the seats, roof-dials and glass-roof are just amazing. In these cars, a chauffeur-separation is absolutely imperative. But the Rolls was the SWB, no? Looks so small at the rear compared to the Bentley (I won't speak of the MM here ). And yes, quite blank-looking interior compared to the two others.Imo it lacks the old-fashioned authenticity, the fabulous wood work, the massive impression of the Bentley, but it does not have the equipment, unique features and modernity of the MM. Thanks a lot for the pics of the Bentley, so hard to find in LWB!
__________________ "Minds are like parachutes. They only function when open." Sir Thomas R. Dewar |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S ^^It is the LWB Phantom. Which features does the Phantom lack exactly? ...as far as I'm aware it extends only to the fully-reclining air-conditioned seats, and the electrochromatic glass roof. According to all reviews, the Rolls has an absolutely amazing entertainment system with unsurpassed sound quality. In all actuality, the Phantom is state-of-the-art, the production process of the Phantom is more advanced than that of the Maybach. Plenty of room in there: ![]() Thanks for the thanks guys. You are far too generous Last edited by SDNR; 12-10-2007 at 07:56 AM. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA Garage: 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 Cabriolet
Posts: 15,642
Thanks: 5,226
Thanked 9,533 Times in 4,030 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S Wow, thanks for the pics Ree. Bentley for me too. It just looks the most authentic here. M
__________________ Merc1 Allstars: SLS, SL63, S65, SLK55, CL63, SL65 BS, E63, R8 5.2, S5, LP560, LP670, M3, Mulsne, BK, DBS, GT500, Gran S, 911, X6M, Z4, Veyron GS, XFR, XKR, ZR1, CC, GTI, CTSV, 458, 599. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Trendsetter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,060
Thanks: 4,098
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,129 Posts
![]() | Re: [pictures] Bentley Arnage RL vs. Rolls Royce Phantom vs. Maybach 62 S ^^^^Oh no, you're not getting off that easily Marcus. How is the Bentley more authentic than the Rolls or Maybach? ...you are beginning to sound like Raoul. ![]() |
| | |