You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures and access many other special features. You will also gain access to our Member's Only Forums, including Car Picture Threads, Automotive Sales and Business News and many more. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Verdict: 4 star out of 5
+excellent traction
+engine very powerfull with linear power delivery(for turbo engine)
+excellent build quality
+standard brakes more then enough
-engine producing vibration on idle
-very prone to understeer
-DRC setup not very best
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Just_me For This Useful Post:
Re: AMS review + 0-200km/h time = Audi RS6 Avant -
03-19-2008, 04:34 AM
That 0-200 is not too impressive for such a powerful car. I don't know what AMS got for M5, but sport auto has it at 13.8. The slalom speed is not impressive either.
So of these three, the M5 Touring has the lowest power-to-weight ratio, yet manages to do 0-200km/h faster than both RS6 Avant and E63 Estate. Can anyone explain how the M5 Touring managed this, and more importantly why the RS6 Avant's superior power-to-weight ratio (~13% better than the M5 Touring) didn't translate into the fastest time for the 0-200km/h test?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Beemer B773ER For This Useful Post:
So of these three, the M5 Touring has the lowest power-to-weight ratio, yet manages to do 0-200km/h faster than both RS6 Avant and E63 Estate. Can anyone explain how the M5 Touring managed this, and more importantly why the RS6 Avant's superior power-to-weight ratio (~13% better than the M5 Touring) didn't translate into the fastest time for the 0-200km/h test?
Re: AMS review + 0-200km/h time = Audi RS6 Avant -
03-19-2008, 05:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemer B773ER
Can anyone explain how the M5 Touring managed this, and more importantly why the RS6 Avant's superior power-to-weight ratio (~13% better than the M5 Touring) didn't translate into the fastest time for the 0-200km/h test?
A more efficient drive line (7speed SMG vs automatic transmission and RWD vs AWD).
I always wondered if Audi went for such a huge leap in HP over the competition cause they wanted to put the RS6 way over the top compared to the competition or cause the car actually needed all that power to beat M5 - it is looking more like it is the latter.
Re: AMS review + 0-200km/h time = Audi RS6 Avant -
03-19-2008, 06:10 AM
I agree.
The E63 looses some hp because of the auto (torque converter, weight, slower gearchange), however the new MCT should make things better on future models.
The RS6 has the same kind of auto tranny, and has the heavy and hp-eater AWD system.
So despite the different power output, the three achieve quite similar performances. Which is of course deceiving for the extremely powerful Audi.