Quote:
|
Originally Posted by klier Yeah, nice and all but what I said is true and the quattro is more than 2 seconds slower. Probably because of the weight and indeed that dreadful automatic gearbox. |
There is no way in this universe that quattro alone adds an obscene 2 seconds to the 0-60 times. Allow me to illustrate how outrageous that claim is by an example:
The 2.0T quattro manual got 6.4 and 6.5 seconds to 60mph in the latest Road & Track and Car & Driver tests (Very impressive for an all-wheel drive 4-cylinder car BTW). If you say that the car will get to 60 MPH in 2 seconds less without quattro, then the A4 2.0T FrontTrak will theoretically get to 60 mph in...um... 4.4 seconds! That's RS4 performance! That obviously is not possible. I clocked the A4 FrontTrak manual on a test drive last year. It got to 60 mph in roughly 6.3 seconds.
Again, quattro adds roughly 0.1 to 0.3 seconds to the straight line. It's the torque-sapping Tiptronic that is to blame for the slower performance.
And again, all this data I'm putting forth is for straight line performance. Even though a FrontTrak A4 may be slightly faster than a quattro A4 in the straight line, the quattro equipped Audi will always destroy the front drive Audi in terms of handling, traction, ride quality, and of course wet-road performance.
Quattro rules.