View Single Post
  (#29 (permalink)) Old
Just_me   Just_me is offline
Me for President
 
Just_me's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,941
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
I drive: Rear Wheel Drive
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 5,606 Times in 2,310 Posts
Just_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond reputeJust_me has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Next-gen BMW M3 a year away? - 09-29-2006, 11:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Artist
but still they had time to be on top of the power chart for a while..
for example M5 was on top for a good while until the E63 came now
but this wont happen with the M3 if its released so late..

PS
With his im not saying that the M3 will be a bad car..it will probably still smoke everthing in the class.. on track atleast
funny thing about E63 is that carmags meassured the cars, the M5 turn out to be faster 200km/h and equal up to 160km/h with the E63. Like I said before, M5 cars are more than just a powerful engine. AMg often has more horsepowers than M but M usually has less weight than AMG. What M cars lose in engine power that they make up with lower weight and better gearing. No, I dont agree that M cars are underpowered, they would be underpowered if the competition beat the M in acceleration with several seconds, now we talking small differences, so underpowered that word isnt correct. also the sales will be sky-high despite what numbers of horsepowers.
Reply With Quote