Thread: AWD comparisons
View Single Post
  (#14 (permalink)) Old
NarutoRamen   NarutoRamen is offline
Aficionado
 
NarutoRamen's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,375
Join Date: Jan 2006
Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 853 Times in 585 Posts
NarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of lightNarutoRamen is a glorious beacon of light
Re: AWD comparisons - 09-01-2006, 12:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinbo


Rocks and sand and ditches and river beds and logs break cars. That’s why, when doing serious off-roading, I trust only a handful of vehicles - most notably the Toyota Land Cruiser pick-ups and wagons and the Land Rover Defenders. I have extensive off-road experience in both and I know exactly why they exist. X5’s, Q7’s and ML’s are on-road vehicles with a measure of off-roading ability (the ML does come with an off-road package option which does enhance it’s capability significantly) and shouldn’t be used without due consideration when discussing off road ability.

Ends
Great Freakin write up man...you are like a car knowledge god!!!

But I will like to add a few vehicles...since i've done a little bit of offroading my self.

Here are a few more vehicles:

1. Jeep Wrangler and any other Jeep that has the RUBICON tested badge.
2. Hummer H1/Humvees/H2 (to some extent)
3. Many other 4x4 Pick-ups such as Ford F-150 (modified of course)

These are some more true off roaders but not all of them out of the box...they're still highly modified. I've seen offroad machines built just purely out of rollcages that cost above 100k...
Reply With Quote