Quote:
Originally Posted by martinbo Request: please swap the two frontal views around so that it's A4 above A4 and A5 above A5.  (Clever ploy Eni, but you can't fool us...)
Opinion: Whilst it can be argued that the current Audi design language is mature and cohesive to the point of monotony, I believe that the trick in appreciating the model differentiation in the Audi range is to look beyond the detail styling elements and view the cars as single, complete articles in the holistic sense.
In my rudimentary appreciation of the marque I have to admit that, despite the repetitive use of detail styling elements, an Audi A8 looks nothing like an A6 which looks nothing like an A4 which, in turn, looks nothing like an A5. The silhouettes, proportions and basic shapes are very different. In my opinion an A5 actually doesn't look like a two door A4, whereas an E92 very much does look like a 2 door E90... if you get my drift.
So, by the same token as the title of this thread I could ask the same question: "Shouldn't the X6 be called the X5 Coupe?" ... or rather X5 Slanty-Bum  ;D |
Martin, pics are randomly put there.
Regarding E90 vs E92. If you think E92 looks just like a 2dr version of E90 you must be blind. Yes, in E46 case that was true. But in E90 vs E92 that's not the case. Yet still both cars are labeled as 3-series.
Regarding X5 vs. X6 ... Let's wait till X6 is officially presented, and then I'll be delighted to open similar poll if necessary.
******
Regarding A4 vs A5: IMO it would be better A5 came with A4 coupe label. I have the same feeling for the X6 (X5 coupe).