View Single Post
  (#4 (permalink)) Old
RICHBOY
Banned
 
Posts: 2,280
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United States
Thanks: 794
Thanked 562 Times in 351 Posts
RICHBOY is just really niceRICHBOY is just really niceRICHBOY is just really niceRICHBOY is just really niceRICHBOY is just really niceRICHBOY is just really nice
RICHBOY is offline
Re: Does A5 really deserve to wear separate (A5) label? - 08-29-2007, 12:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinbo View Post
Request: please swap the two frontal views around so that it's A4 above A4 and A5 above A5. (Clever ploy Eni, but you can't fool us...)

Opinion: Whilst it can be argued that the current Audi design language is mature and cohesive to the point of monotony, I believe that the trick in appreciating the model differentiation in the Audi range is to look beyond the detail styling elements and view the cars as single, complete articles in the holistic sense.

In my rudimentary appreciation of the marque I have to admit that, despite the repetitive use of detail styling elements, an Audi A8 looks nothing like an A6 which looks nothing like an A4 which, in turn, looks nothing like an A5. The silhouettes, proportions and basic shapes are very different. In my opinion an A5 actually doesn't look like a two door A4, whereas an E92 very much does look like a 2 door E90... if you get my drift.

So, by the same token as the title of this thread I could ask the same question: "Shouldn't the X6 be called the X5 Coupe?" ... or rather X5 Slanty-Bum ;D
Excellent point my friend! By the way, thanks for the straight on head shot of the A4 EnI, very aggresive looking for a known S/RS model!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RICHBOY For This Useful Post:
monstamaticCRO (02-27-2008)