Well I don't dispute that C&D times are quicker than everyone else's, but you have understand the way they obtain the numbers. Also, if you look at their "street start" numbers which is 5-60 mph, those times are much more realistic. As far as the difference in numbers we're splitting hairs here (SL600 test excluded).

As far as the touring numbers, the previous E55 Touring was faster than the E55 sedan in their testing also. I think it the traction advantage of the wagon myself, but then there is a location, temperature, miles on the engine, etc. etc. etc. Car and Driver used to have a TV show in which they showed exactly how their testing was done so I trust them.

I guess barring that SL600 episode I really don't see why there is any reason to doubt what C&D comes up with, they use the best method possible for getting 0-60 times, the brake/torque or drag method. Their figures are "strange" they are correct for the method they use to get them. Again, see their street start times, much closer to what the average joe can get out of their car.

M